No, it's not still food poisoning! I greatly enjoyed the reprint of the 1908 Ladies' Home Journal article entitled "High Heels and Low Heels: The Difference Shown in X-Ray Photographs by Alexander C. Magruder, M.D." in the book The Seductive Shoe: Four Centuries of Fashion Footwear by Jonathan Walford.
The basic premise boils down to the following:
Pros: A higher arched foot is more attractive. A woman's height is increased. The foot measures shorter and therefore more feminine.
Cons: Bodily discomfort. Tiring easily. Irritability. NERVOUS BREAKDOWN. Lack of equilibrium. Lessened lung capacity. Weakening heart muscles.
I especially enjoyed the last sentence, "Of course, these organic changes are not so rapid as to be noticed at once; but they gradually appear, with cumulative effect, and sooner or later transform the girl of spirit into a listless person; the rosy cheeks to pale ones; the erect figure to stooped shoulders; the healthy, hearty, robust person to a semi-invalid or a total one."
So, if I ever become a listless, pale, stooped, semi (or total) invalid, on the verge of a nervous breakdown, we know exactly where lies the blame.
No comments:
Post a Comment